State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 92-15

Withdrawn Opinion 92-15

Withdrawn 6/19/2014


Question
May a judicial officer appoint an attorney as a pro tem judge if the attorney is a member of the board of trustees of a non-profit corporation which provides public defender services to the court, when public defender attorneys who are employed by that corporation would appear before that pro tem judge?

Answer
CJC Canon 5B applies to pro tem judges while they are serving in that capacity. CJC Canon 5B(1) provides that judges should not serve if it is likely that the organization will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the judge or will be regularly engaged in adversary proceedings in court.

Because the public defenders would appear in this court before the pro tem judge, it would not be appropriate under Canon 5B(1) for the judge to appoint the attorney who serves on the public defender board as the pro tem judge.

See Opinion 92-3

NOTE: Effective June 23, 1995, the Supreme Court amended the Code of Judicial Conduct. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

  • Opinion 92-15-See CJC Canon 2(A).

Opinion 92-15

09/21/1992

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S3